Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluking
It'd be nice if some of our resident criminal psychologists that spent a number of pages accusing the husband would offer some sort of apology now that the facts are out. If you're okay with wild conjecture based on your Criminal Psychology 200 course and a few back seasons of CSI, you should be okay with saying that aforementioned wild conjecture was in poor taste and borderline defamation of character. Calgary is not that big a town.
|
I am not sure what the big deal of Calgary not being a big town or concerns this guy might read the board are.
People were talking about his possible guilt in a general "husbands are usually the guys who did it" way. Nobody once said Mr. Nabb is guilty because of something they knew/heard about him personally.
If anything all husbands should be pissed off because it was husbands, not Nabb personally, that had their character questioned.