Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
I'm just basing my opinion on what has been made available. If it comes out that she was SA'd then, obviously, it's a completely different situation.
The interwebz would be very boring if the only posts one could make were "well, I don't know enough to have an opinion.... also, thoughts & prayers."  Typically, the media reports it if there was a SA - they haven't. So, my opinion is based on what has come out so far - a brutal facial beating. If the facts change dramatically, so will my opinion. |
I would normally agree with you, but I honestly think the fact that these two individuals are Calgarians calls for a little easing of our accusations. Call me a bleeding heart, but we already know that one CP member, possibly more, are friends with the victim, and I find it a little jerkish on our part (Ive been guilty too) to be making wild accusations based on very little evidence.
More importantly than that, these two are Canadian citizens and why the hell should we give the benefit of the doubt to anyone but them? Call that an ugly spin-off of the American sense of patriotism, I dont care. Even if we find out that you are correct and the husband is guilty, will things really be drastically affected because we decided to lay off the "he's obviously guilty" rhetoric? On the other hand, if it is clearly determined that the husband is innocent and the couple comes home to find out every forum in their city, which seems to be the case, had the nerve to label the husband as being the guilty party, Im guessing there might be grounds for some serious resentment...
Once again, call me a bleeding heart . Whatever- might take some heat for this.