From the link I posted above.
Quote:
|
…they are willfully infringing copyrights themselves on these systems; have actual knowledge that the materials on their systems are infringing (or alternatively know facts or circumstances that would make infringing material apparent); receive a financial benefit directly attributable to copyright-infringing activity where the provider can control that activity; and have not removed, or disabled access to, known copyright infringing material from servers they control.
|
It would make sense to take them down I guess. If content that is 'illegal' would be reported, and MU would not remove it, then at some point they are engaging in illegal activity.