Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
You cant guarantee a better final simply based on a playoff.
Let's got through 3 scenarios.
If this were pre-BCS, LSU would have played in the Sugar Bowl against someone and if theyhad won, they're the only undefeated team and they win the title. Is that wrong?
The BCS presents an extra game for LSU against the #2 and since they lost, #2 Alabama is now the undisputed champion. Is that wrong?
If there a 4 or 8 team playoff then #1 LSU has to play more games while giving other teams a chance as well. Let's say #8 West Virginia wins the title despite losing 3 games this year. Is that wrong?
Which scenario do you like best?
|
Again...all that is based completely and entirely on a rating system done by writers and coaches....thats the inherent flaw inall this and can be traced back to the beginning of every season...you have coaches who have a blatent agenda to skew it their way, and writers who sinply cannot watch all the teams every weekend to make a decision properly....nevermind they need to do so before a single ball has been snapped at years start, and thats without having a clue about what other teams are going to look like.
the only equitable and fair way to know is to let it happen on the field...afterall this is what its all about....right?