View Single Post
Old 01-10-2012, 10:38 AM   #58
geos
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger View Post
This will help a lot of borderline people who may have been unjustly charged by the new laws. It may also help some drunks drive without prosecution. He's also going to help a bunch of stone cold sober people avoid hour long line ups and not miss whatever engagement it is that they're trying to attend.
Exactly. It's not even about people that will face suspensions under the new laws, as I somewhat agree (I've done a test with an officer before to determine what 0.05 feels like and I can tell you I would not drive at 0.05).

What I have no patience for whatsoever is being detained for 30 minutes waiting in a bus after one drink and blowing 0.02 on the roadside device. Well, maybe you'll be 0.05 after waiting a half hour. Ya ok.

What about the Charter? Unreasonable detainment there IMO.

I think the book should be thrown at anyone over 0.05 (once the appropriate laws have been passed, which they haven't IMO). I think if you're in an accident that involved alcohol, you should never drive again. Ever.

But stopping and detaining individuals on no reasonable grounds (especially when the offensive rate is <0.1%) is absurd and a violation of my liberty. So I have little sympathy for checkstops. Perhaps the officers should be in their vehicles driving around, stopping individuals with erratic driving patterns at the night. You'd probably have a much higher conviction/charge rate.

You'd have a higher conviction rate stopping shoppers at Walmart and searching their bags for stolen goods... that's the honest truth.
geos is offline   Reply With Quote