Quote:
Originally posted by Lanny_MacDonald+Sep 17 2004, 09:43 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lanny_MacDonald @ Sep 17 2004, 09:43 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Cowperson@Sep 17 2004, 01:46 PM
You seem to be agreeing with my premise that it may not be about GW Bush being divisive given this is now the second election in a row at a dead heat.
|
George W Bush, divisive? I don't even know what you mean? How can a candidate be divisive when you can run a dead mule against a candidate and have the dead mule win? This country is all about partisan politics so if you're looking for a divisive factor look no further than the antiquated bi-polar two party system they use down here.
Really, George Bush has nothing to do with this election. To me this election is all about who will be driving the bus after the election. To me that means getting the neo-con PNAC lunatics out of the Whitehouse at all costs. I don't care if George Bush hangs around (well maybe I do a little as the guy is an embarassment of unbelievable stature every time he attempts to speak publicly) but the likes of Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Elliot, Dobriansky, etc. have to go and go fast. They have got this country on a fast track to oblivion. [/b][/quote]
You know, I think we will see those guys shown the door. Powerful members of the Republican party, including George's dad, have probably seen about enough of that bunch. Nobody will say it, but their little project in Iraq has not exactly gone off without a hitch. The chorus of boos will grow louder as it drags on and one by one, I think, they'll either quit or be quietly turfed.
Here's hoping, anyway.