Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
That's ridiculous.
She could have given that to a useful charity or something.
Would have been better than wasting it like that.
|
What kind of charity can make use of a house in a fancy neighborhood that costs several hundred grand a year in maintenance and taxes?
Or are you saying they should have loaded this house up on trucks and set it down in the projects?
Is there really a feasible charitable option here?
I don't really get the criticism. It is much better for everyone else when rich people spend put their money back into the economy vs just sitting on it. She can obviously afford this without much issue, and may actually be better off for the investment. I suppose this kind of move isn't so great for the environment, but not much us humans do is.