Thread: Superbowl XL
View Single Post
Old 02-05-2006, 08:00 PM   #36
browna
Franchise Player
 
browna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I can't be bothered to watch the end...glad to see some neutrals are seeing the same horse**** refereeing I am.

Jackson PI call - May as well have called illegal touching on the PITT Saftey...he touched as as much as Jackson pushed off.
+4 pts Seattle.

Rothelsiberger TD - The line judge ran in from the side with his arm in the air, signifying 4th down...then changes his mind as he runs, calls TD. Then the replay...Did anyone see conclusive proof that it was in? For the conclusive proof on the replay....well, if the line judge stuck with his original call, there was no explicit proof he was in the endzone either. The original call the line judge made should've stood.
- 4 points PITT

Phantom holding call on Stevens catch to get SEA down on the 1. That "holding" happens 75% of the time in any NFL game, annoucers even had to agree that it was a no call....brutal 5 holding calls vs Seattle, none vs Pitt.
Seattle +7 points

Then the interception tackle by Hasselback called as a low block (????)adds 15 yds on the play, and Pittsburgh gets it at mid field. Then a missed holding call on the first play negates setting the Steelers back 10 yds..the very nexy play, at the 50 the Steelers run the trick play...believe me, they don't do that trick play if they at their own 30 as it should've been.


Should be 24-17 SEA with compotent refereeing. Disgraceful and disgusting and completely in Pittsburgh's favor.

Last edited by browna; 02-05-2006 at 08:31 PM.
browna is online now   Reply With Quote