Quote:
Originally Posted by moon
Nothing.
But if the issue was that Burris makes too much and they wanted cap space then unlike the NHL they don't have to trade him they cut him.
The point is they didn't need to trade Burris to improve their cap space. So that really isn't a positive in the deal because they easily could have done it with the trade or not.
|
I agree, between Tate's extension and Glenn i would suspect the Stamps are paying Qbs virtually the same they ddi last year. Huff has spoken recently that he does not expect to save money at the QB position this season.
This trade was about getting something for an asset they didn't require, and also doing something right for Burris who wanted it out, it was not about cap savings. Releasing Reynolds and maybe moving out Rambo or Bryant could save money off their cap, but I don't beleive the cap is a problem for the Stamps.