Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagor
Here ....
304
Suarez claimed that the word was used with no ill-meaning and wasn't retaliatory. Daglish then contradicts him by deciding that he used the word as a retaliation (suggesting a derogatory intent) to being taunted.
|
Thank you for finding that, I'm not going to go through that whole beast of a paper.
This is still all a bunch of assumptions though. They assume that Suarez's comments are derogatory because Dalglish says they were in retaliation to Evra's comments?
You would think that if Suarez said "Negro" as any times as Evra has claimed, that one of the 20 other players on the pitch, or the ref, or the linesman, or the managers, or the substitute players, or the media members and camera men would have heard or seen some of this taking place.
The fact that nobody else knew this was happening is a lot better proof then Evra's statements.