Quote:
Originally Posted by MoneyGuy
Wrong science? It's written by a skilled interviewer who was an athiest attempting to disprove God who interviewed some of the most brilliant scientific minds of our time. He went in with a preconceived notion and had it dispelled. Your contention is wrong.
|
From what I understand of what the book says with respect to science, it is wrong. Just because one person interviewed some scientific minds does not mean a) that he understood the science right b) that he remembered it right or c) that it was relevant to his conclusions.
If you want, you could post a few of the more compelling things from Strobel's book and we can discuss them.
Why are Strobel's conclusions compelling to you, but someone who has gone in the other direction (was a theist attempting to prove god but then lost their faith as a result of their research and interaction with brilliant minds) not?