View Single Post
Old 12-20-2011, 04:31 PM   #1340
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by handgroen View Post
I have an ongoing debate with some friends over whether or not it is ethical to send objects or interfere with planets we believe to harbor life.

My contention is that because of the dramatic distance between our planet and other prospective "earths," exploration is and will always be impossible. Even if you were to send a probe, it would be thousands of years getting there and hundreds of years for the data to be beamed back. Which IMO is a fruitless albeit still somewhat noble pursuit.
Sooo I think it would be interesting to send physical objects to planets we believe could be home to sentient life. Sort of a message in a bottle scenario. A device to create fire for example, or a hand driven crank that lights an incandescent bulb. The particular objects i'm not quite sure of.

This seems to always draw the ire of someone in the conversation. This person feels an intense fear of "screwing" with something we don't understand. My question is do you guys think that it's totally reckless to undertake a mission of that kind? and if not what would you like to send?

btw if i really like to wind up the person I'm talking with about this, I say we could send large amounts of highly radioactive material. So as to encourage mutation and accelerate evolution on planet x.
The implication of 2001: A Space Odyssey, is that an advanced alien culture sent an object to Earth, that jump-started human (intelligence) evolution.
troutman is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post: