Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda
wikipedia has editors that go through articles and remove false or misleading information, and the major news sites have the same publishing standards as their magazine counterparts (for the most part)
|
Wikipedia having editors is a good step in the right direction, but they can only do so much and the level of expertise attracted to a volunteer, non-paying position is suboptimal. I have seen erroneous medical passages on there that have not been corrected for some time, likely because the editors lack the manpower/knowledge to correct them. It seems all you need to do is cite
anything to support your claim, and it won't get flagged for review.