View Single Post
Old 12-10-2011, 09:24 PM   #448
ken0042
Playboy Mansion Poolboy
 
ken0042's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RW99 View Post
So with the 32.9% that were over 0.8% BAC, how many of those thought they were below 0.8 BAC? Would the changes to the legal limit would give them more food for thought before they get behind the wheel?
Setting aside the "Let's penalize one group for the actions of another group" arguement for a moment; let's look at the stats that Matt had up earlier:

61.3%- Sober
3.6%- .01-.05
2.2%- .05-.08
10.3%- .08-.16
22.6%- .16 and higher.

So there are two problems with your arguement; once again setting aside what I said above:

- We are targeting the wrong group. Let's target the group that has the least business being on the road. (Not saying that the 10.3% should be on the road, just that the 22.6% is even more wrong being there.)

- How many people .16 and higher do you think had any thought that maybe they were under .08? And assuming you think somebody has that kind of stupidity and/or denial; what makes you think they wouldn't now just assume they are at .05 now?

If we are going to change laws, let's do this:
- Keep the under .08 the way it was.
- .08-.11; same penalties as we see now
- .12-.16; automatic jail time. First offense- 6 months. Second offense- 23 months, etc.
- .17 and above; automatic jail time again. But now 5 years for the first offense.
ken0042 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ken0042 For This Useful Post: