Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
I guess you are probably right in that.
I just like the result of BC law, it has reduced deaths, and it has obviously reduced the amount of drinking as restaurants have complained. That has to be good for drivers overall. People argued to go after the higher drinker with stiffer penalties, that would help some but not completely, so you have to have stricter rule at the low end too to change societies views.
the argument that the law is unconstitutional, at the low end that people are arguing it was found to be constitutional. So what is the counterargument now that the BC courts said that part of the rule and the 3 day suspension they have is fine.
|
Do you catch many balls out there in left field?