Quote:
Originally Posted by jar_e
That's not even close to being true in regards to being charged with impaired. Roadsides are approved by the criminal code of canada as being allowed as evidence.
The amount of misinformation in this thread is baffling and concerning if anyone is reading this thread for any sort of legal advice.
|
From the Calgary Herald article linked in the OP:
Quote:
|
stiff penalties for people who are not convicted of any criminal offence is going too far, especially considering that hand-held roadside testing devices can be inaccurate and their results are not even admissible in court.
|
Emphasis added.
Are you disputing this point? If so, please provide a link to support your claim. I would also suggest you write to the editor of the Herald and ask them to print a correction if their reporting is inaccurate.