Quote:
Originally Posted by GFG4Life
How is it redundant when it was published today?
And however you want to spin your stats, or your percentages, (for either argument) 45 fewer crash deaths in the 1 year the new laws have been in effect, certainly is a positive thing. Can't argue with that.
|
Because it was already posted on the first page. It is a rehashed article.
And actually I can argue with the law causing fewer deaths. The reduction wasn't caused at all by the new law but by my Drunk Driving repellant rock.
Would you like to buy my rock?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger
So stats on one side of the argument are wrong and stats on the other side of the argument from a twitter account are gold...
|
Uh, what?
No one is questioning the validity of the stats. It is the cause of the statistics. There is hardly a correlation between the new law in BC and the decrease, let alone causation.
Based on the number of drunk driving fatalities and the BAC content of the drivers in those fatalities the stats about decreases don't make plausible sense.