[Cowperson]

They were wrong. They've admitted it. They have said they were wrong. How much more obvious can it be? They have admitted to being wrong and what you are now saying is "no, they weren't wrong". I mean come on

I agree. They were wrong. They admitted they were wrong. I'm not one of those clinging to hope of something showing up.

On the other hand, I believe my exact words before the conflict were: "I don't know if he has them and I don't know if he doesn't have them but its time to end this 12 year charade and find out."

I didn't really have a big problem with nothing being there although, as I noted a few years ago on this board, in all of our debates, pretty much everyone opposed to the conflict never actually supposed that Saddam had absolutely nothing (ZERO).

Most people here objecting to the invasion, if they were honest with themselves, did so on moral grounds or some other pretext but ZERO was usually not one of the reasons given in this forum.

In other words, pretty much everyone on both sides seemed pretty surprised absolutely ZERO was there . . . . that's one argument only Scott Ritter was making.

I suspect Sada will start turning up on various talk shows and news programs in the next few days.

Cowperson