Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Vick's new contract is another. You can't give a guy that kind of money based off a stretch of 10 games. They had him tagged and he wasn't causing problems, why tie yourself to the guy? Then there's the whole wide 9 fiasco. When you declare yourself "all in" for the Super Bowl and fail so miserably, someone has to be held accountable.
The good news for us Eagles fans is that, according to pythagorem theory, we should have 2 more wins than we do and we're 1-4 in games decided by a TD or less. Those are huge statistical anomalies that usually reverse themselves in the following years.
|
yeah it really amazed me how so many people got on the Vick bandwagon so quickly, you could already tell he wasnt as good in the last part of the season as he was in the first part last year. If the Eagles wanted to go all in, why didnt they do that in the Mcnabb era when they were in the NFC championship all those years in a row?