I'm confused. The article makes it seem as if the part blanked out is a-hole. Since when is that racist?
It then says he made mention of Woods being half black/half asian but I don't see that either.
Quote:
|
While it would already create major international headlines with Williams referring to Woods as part of the biological posterior, the fact that he referred to his mixed heritage makes it so far out of bounds that the white stakes aren’t even visible – no pun intended.
|
Calling your former boss an a-hole isn't very nice but it isn't racist. What am I missing here?