Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteTiger
I don't know if I like that "You'll get a better ending if you do well in multiplayer" bit, personally. I've never been a huge fan of multiplayer. But my main problem is that I don't like playing with random folks on the 'net. Perhaps there's enough to be some interest in folks from CP, though.
|
listen to what he says right after that bit. if you do everything there is to do in the single player campaign, you don't have to touch multiplayer to get the best ending. all MP is doing is letting you get to that best scenario a different way. the more i think about that the more i like it, especially when you consider that some people may have ME1 and ME2 playthroughs that screw their chances in the big war. what if you killed the Rachni and Council in ME1 and then blew up the Collector base in ME2? i think you'd be pretty screwed for resources against the Reapers in that situation, but the MP side missions could help make up for that
i just hope that ME3 actually gives you proper multiple endings that reflect your choices in all 3 games, and not simply "win or fail". my main Shepherd character killed the Rachni and Council and then fully sided with Cerberus and kept the station. i want her ending to reflect that and have Humanity as the only dominant species left in the galaxy after everything is said and done (and get my own alternate universe from Star Trek). whereas my male Shepherd character is all about building a massive multi-species fleet to deal with the Reapers and i want to see that reflected as well