Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
hey man, if you have zero problem with a company exploiting tax loopholes to pay zero tax in a country while still recording massive profits, then all the power to you. I for one, have a problem with that and think the government needs to change the taxation/regulatory system so this doesn't happen so easily. Obviously our opinions on the matter differ, which is fine by me.
|
Apparently the point flew right over your head. You think the GOVERNMENT needs to change the taxation/regulatory structure, and I don't completely disagree.
The point I raised was based on your previous post in which it was okay for a company to utilize the tax laws to achieve x result but not to achieve y. Why is that? If both companies are subject to the same laws, and both companies abide by those laws, why is one choice okay and the other is not? It's based solely on the result, correct? And who's fault is that? It's a companies fault for operating within the regulatory realm to which it is subject? If you think achieving result y is unjust then target the laws that facilitate the achievement of that result, not the parties who simply operate within those laws.