Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
for her to point the finger at an entirely innocent person - that is being a bitch.
|
Or ... just maybe it was someone acting under extreme duress and she was coerced to do so.
I'm presuming you're familiar with one of the British Justice systems' biggest miscarriage of justice and fix job in recent memory that happened a few clicks down the road from you in the Old Bailey, i.e. the case of the Guildford Four.
All 4 gave statements saying they were guilty, one even said that another said he would kill him if he didn't do the job and implicated another at the scene of the crime. The actions of a bitch, a guilty man or of someone acting under extreme duress?
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
I personally have found people arn't that that inconsistant under interogation unless they are struggling to hold a lie together, there have been cases where a cop has managed to persuade mentally handicapped or ######ed guys to confess to things they didn't do but this was a very bright girl being interviewed by a cop who was not using their first language, I cannot see it being a particularly persuasive interrogation, unpleasent and stressfull, but that wouldn't make someone accuse someone else randomly or give such a contradictory story.
|
No? What makes you think she accused him randomly? Maybe she signed a dictated statement? Again ... consider the extreme duress factor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
And can I be clear about this, my suspicions are based on her lying and pointing the finger at an innocent man - a man she knew to be innocent, which is conveniently ignored by those having a great time going after me.
|
I find it astounding that you're not even considering (a) the extreme duress factor and (b) that the cops might have been trying to fit the other fella up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnet Flame
about trying to understand what the police had to gain by having Knox implicate Lumumba.]
|
A high profile crime case closed?