Quote:
Originally Posted by Red-Mile-DJ
So I'm watching this live on CNN, and the one reporter interviewed a local student. You can immediately tell that the student was influenced by the TABLOID stories about Knox and her boyfriend.
Why is it so hard to look at the evidence? There was NO EVIDENCE against Knox and her boyfriend. The prosecution made everything up, and got a faulty confession from her and him.
Why don't people remember that the Italians already have ONE guy behind bars, facing the crime. The black guy...whatever his name was. His DNA was ALL OVER the room. He admitted guilt, in exchange for a lighter sentence.
Amanda Knox and her boyfriend were pulled in by a prosecutor that doesn't know his head from his butt, and a corrupt justice system in Italy.
I'm glad to see her and her boyfriend go free.
|
Most people are influenced by the media. Look at this trial, Michael Jacksons trials looked hilarious when/if a person actually looked at the evidence/testimony which is public.
That's too hard for a lot of people to do. Hell, the media themselves ignore a lot of evidence to make stories look "sexy".