Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
So what?
It doesn't matter what combination of explosive or incindiery materials were used, either way the culprits had to have access to the buildings. Whether it was one stick of dynamite or a truck load of thermite and C4...this needs to be investigated.
Of course Neils Harrit included those comments in his report of possible error, every good scientist does that. It wasn't just the presence of those materials in the dust, but the way the particles were arranged in the little chips. It was not a mechanical mixture, but arranged in a very specific way, done in a labratory. The NIST report by the way, did not test any dust samples........does that sound like proper investigative procedure? ...not to mention CDI shipping 90+% of the steel to China almost immediately.
I don't know why you stand behind the official story when the very commission panel who investigated 9-11 doesn't stand by it. It's unbelievable...
Maybe watch a video interview with Harrit, he is very adamant that something is wrong. It is just so easy to pick a few points out of a comprehensive report while glossing over the stuff you are never going to change your mind on anyways...
And about Al-Qaeda in Libya, ...forgive me, just substitute "America" with "NATO". But you and I both know who runs that show.
...I'm out hockey's on!
|
A once again, Harrit doesn't just report his errors, he plainly states that he's never seen thermite, nanothermite in its natural or residue burned off stage so he's making a guess, on residue and dust that was not contained in a sterile environment and was exposed to moisture and the elements for an extended period of time.
As much as you bitch about the shoddy investigation methods of the U.S. government and Nist etc, you're sure willing to accept the same from your side as long as it confirms your theory.
Frankly you keep hanging your hat on the commission members not backing the 9/11 commission report, but what they're saying and their criticisms are a long way from alluding to a false flag or inside job.
The criticisms by the co chairs were that they weren't given enough time or money to take the commission to proper conclusions, they criticized that some agencies stonewalled and were protective of their own agenda.
However non of the self criticism that I read screams that the commission believes or were anywhere near reaching a conclusion based on evidence that the U.S. was involved in 9/11
Again, I want solid proof that America is directly involved in funding al Queda in Libya.
I want solid proof that Al Queda was funded by the U.S. directly.
I want you to prove to me that the U.S. funded or armed the foreign Muhahadeen in AFghanistan during the Afghan Soviet War.