Quote:
Originally Posted by Canuck-Hater
You do realize science confirmed that there was residue was in the dust right? These dust samples were collected at ground zero. I know the establishment media will come up with every excuse in the book to discredit reality. But wait nope a scientist with 30 years experience is clearly a "crazy conspiracy theorist"
|
So your willing to ignore the fact that the dust evidence that the tests were run on were not tested for 6 years were not kept in a sterile environment and were exposed to oxygen, and moisture and other elements.
You ignored the entire part of my post where I stated that there were massive quantities of aluminum in the WTC buildings and there were also massive quantities of steel which would more then likely lead to aluminum and oxides.
You also ignored your own scientists paper where he states that it could be the remnants of nano thermite but he's never really seen it and has nothing to compare it to.
Then he basically debunks his own theory by switching to using small quantities of thermite as a detonator and 100's of tons of conventional explosives.
And yes, your scientist is crazy, while he claims that he got his work peer reviewed, he got it reviewed by other conspiracy theorists not un objective peers.
Then he goes on to make theories about building security and the lack of explosive sniffing dogs in the buildings for days before the world trade center.
so to summarize.
There was residue on the debris, but the debris was more then likely contaminated by 6 years of exposure in peoples homes.
He theorizes that the residue was caused by Nano Thermite, but he's never seen or worked or is able to compare to nano thermite
He changed his theory to thermite as a trigger and 100's of tons of conventional explosives, and that kills his theory about the amount of residue with the dust because the quantity of residue is to large.
He makes theories about building security to match his theory even though the man knows nothing about demolitions or building security, he's a chemist.
The establishment media doesn't need to discredit him, he manages to do it himself with shoddy methods and logical leaps that would boggle the mind of a crack addict on a 10 day bender.