View Single Post
Old 09-29-2011, 07:08 PM   #40
mikey_the_redneck
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Even further conclusions by Harrit (btw who goes beyond chemical analysis to claim things like Dog sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC weeks before, and then disputes his own findings with quotes like this

It’s very, very possible that different varieties were used, and I personally am certain that conventional explosives were used too, in abundance.

RT: When you say “in abundance,” how much do you mean?

Niels Harrit: Tons! Hundreds of tons! Many, many, many tons!

RT: So we are not just talking about nano-thermite. In fact, we are talking about both nano-thermite and conventional explosives used in large quantities…"


So now we're back to hundreds of tons of conventional explosives being used.

Plus going further into the samples that were stored for 6 years and exposed to oxyen the precence of Iron Oxide are no surprise.
So what?

It doesn't matter what combination of explosive or incindiery materials were used, either way the culprits had to have access to the buildings. Whether it was one stick of dynamite or a truck load of thermite and C4...this needs to be investigated.

Of course Neils Harrit included those comments in his report of possible error, every good scientist does that. It wasn't just the presence of those materials in the dust, but the way the particles were arranged in the little chips. It was not a mechanical mixture, but arranged in a very specific way, done in a labratory. The NIST report by the way, did not test any dust samples........does that sound like proper investigative procedure? ...not to mention CDI shipping 90+% of the steel to China almost immediately.

I don't know why you stand behind the official story when the very commission panel who investigated 9-11 doesn't stand by it. It's unbelievable...

Maybe watch a video interview with Harrit, he is very adamant that something is wrong. It is just so easy to pick a few points out of a comprehensive report while glossing over the stuff you are never going to change your mind on anyways...

And about Al-Qaeda in Libya, ...forgive me, just substitute "America" with "NATO". But you and I both know who runs that show.

...I'm out hockey's on!
mikey_the_redneck is offline   Reply With Quote