View Single Post
Old 09-29-2011, 04:50 PM   #35
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Even further conclusions by Harrit (btw who goes beyond chemical analysis to claim things like Dog sniffing dogs were removed from the WTC weeks before, and then disputes his own findings with quotes like this

It’s very, very possible that different varieties were used, and I personally am certain that conventional explosives were used too, in abundance.

RT: When you say “in abundance,” how much do you mean?

Niels Harrit: Tons! Hundreds of tons! Many, many, many tons!

RT: So we are not just talking about nano-thermite. In fact, we are talking about both nano-thermite and conventional explosives used in large quantities…"



So now we're back to hundreds of tons of conventional explosives being used.

Plus going further into the samples that were stored for 6 years and exposed to oxyen the precence of Iron Oxide are no surprise.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote