Quote:
Originally Posted by IliketoPuck
Haha you are all so old, look at you arguing about Clapton and the Stones.
Next it will be whether Dave Groehl was better in Nirvana or the Foo.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronck
I'd say it's pretty close-Foos have done some great things and are one of the best live acts going. Nirvana was great but were cut down in their prime, if Kurt had lived, would they be as popular as Pearl Jam is right now? Would they be the new Beatles? Cobain's hatred for the industry and love of drugs could've really DE-railed him anyways.
|
Yeah, but he said
Quote:
|
Next it will be whether Dave Groehl was better in Nirvana or the Foo
|
He was asking about Dave Grohl specifically, not just a straight up "who's better, Nirvana or Foo Fighters?".
In that context, you'd have to say that what he's personally done as frontman of the Foo Fighters is better than what he did as the drummer in Nirvana.