Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
So I'm assumed to be a truther because I'd like to see more evidence?
Why?
I know a plane has crashed into the Pentagon. There's pictures, first-hand eye witness testimonials and a three-frame video clip released by the Pentagon.
I'm simply wondering if there is more video footage, that is all.
Would some of you like more evidence from the disallowed goal in 2004? It won't change the result, but if there's more evidence I'd still be interested in seeing it.
THIS IS NO DIFFERENT.
|
I don't think any of that would make you a truther. To me that label applies when someone refuses to accept something as truthful until they see x ,y & z regardless of mountains of other evidence. It's putting the emphasis on a certain element as if it is the only plausible explanation, and frequently shifting that emphasis onto new things in order to constantly be able to pretend that proof doesn't exist.