Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
So I'm assumed to be a truther because I'd like to see more evidence?
Why?
I know a plane has crashed into the Pentagon. There's pictures, first-hand eye witness testimonials and a three-frame video clip released by the Pentagon.
I'm simply wondering if there is more video footage, that is all.
Would some of you like more evidence from the disallowed goal in 2004? It won't change the result, but if there's more evidence I'd still be interested in seeing it.
THIS IS NO DIFFERENT.
|
A truther is anybody that asserts there is an alternate theory to the plainly obvious one.
There is not a signal schred fo evidence to support any alternate thoery to what happened on 9/11. Alternate theories rely entirely on out of context quotes and circumstantial evidence.
Were the world trade centre buildings insured? Yes. Doest that potentially create a motive for their destruction? Yes. Is there any evidence to show that they were purposely brought down? No.
The problem with your question is that you've set some ridiculous standard of proof, that is totally unatainable. You're then using that lack of evidence towards that standard as reason to speculate there is an alternate explanation besides the painfullly obvious one.
The simple truth of the matter is that in 2001 camera technology wasn't that great and filming the pentagon building was not an everday activity. After a plane hits the ground or a building at full speed there is very little discernable wreckage left. In incidents where planes have hit the ground in the past, there is normally just a blacked crater, random metal debris and potentially a few bits of wing and/or tail, which is exactly what the post-crash pentagon wrekcage shows.
The rest of the details have been fully explained.
What exactly do you think is out there? What exactly are you looking for?