Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
Lack of video evidense is only relevant to the missile arguement, in fact it would have appeared to have spawned the missile arguement, but personally I cannot see an iota of common sense in the idea the Pentagon was hit by a missile on so many levels, not least of which is that the missile or plane actually impacted the ground slightly in front of the building and effectively skipped into it, something laser guided missiles dont do, but an amauter flown plane would likely do.
|
Why make such an elaborate downswing with a huge airliner to hit the building from the side when Hanjour could have just brought it down on top of the Pentagon? He surely could have created far more damage that way. It's like instead of stomping on an empty box to collapse it from the top, you kick lower half of the bottom side to try to achieve the same results, which is infinitely harder. I'll never get it.