Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
I`m not sure I understand the correlation here. Why does me believing Flight 77 hit the Pentagon suggest I should believe there was no additional footage?
 |
Because if you believe it was Flight 77 there is absoloutly no reason for the goverment to hide any footage, in fact it is in their interest to release it, therefore the fact they havn't means, logically, there isn't anything else.
Basic common sense would tell you that if it was 77 that hit the building whatever the goverment had in videos they would release, if regardless of that you still think they are hiding something then it is your own anti goverment paranoia speaking, not common sense.
In fact I would go so far as to say if the goverment was hiding something they would have spared no expense to provide you with a really good film of the plane crashing to shut you up, the lack of film, if anything, tends to prove it was a hijacked plane.
Lack of video evidense is only relevant to the missile arguement, in fact it would have appeared to have spawned the missile arguement, but personally I cannot see an iota of common sense in the idea the Pentagon was hit by a missile on so many levels, not least of which is that the missile or plane actually impacted the ground slightly in front of the building and effectively skipped into it, something laser guided missiles dont do, but an amauter flown plane would likely do.