Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
By innocent I mean the government's "we had nothing to do with this" story. My point is that in this particular incident, I don't think their hands are entirely clean.
Additionally, the FBI swept the area for evidence right after the plane hit. The FBI is not known to be first-responders on any crime scene. Now granted, they probably did have some real estate in the Pentagon anyways, but the main FBI building, the J. Edgar Hoover building, is almost 3 miles away. I'm sure protocols are different for a defense building, but that just seems fishy.
Also, they haven't released any other footage of the plane hitting, and have far more confiscated video than publicly-released video. Can someone please explain this to me if the proof is apparently in the five-frame security footage the Pentagon released themselves?
|
The Pentagon being a federal building, the attack was in the FBI's pervue, therefore only they and the secret service would be involved, the fact they were there first is because they have a permanant presence there, normally the local plod would arrive and then hand over to the feds as soon as they got there, in this case the feds were on the site first.
As to film of the plane hitting I doubt there is much of any, how much footage is there of the first plane strike in New York? virtually none that I have seen despite there being thousands of cameras there as well, cameras all point downwards in normal use, I have no doubt the film from the security camera they did release is by far and away the best they have, and that is virtually unintelligable.
Adendum, I went and looked up the wtc 1 crash, there are 2 videos, one is actually very good as it was taken by some firemen that seem to be filming some form of training exercise when the plane flew over their head, a pure coincidence. The other is basically just film of the debris ejecting after the crash from some tourist, again coincidence.