Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I am really confused what you meanby innocent. I am also confused what you find weird about the security protocols of perhaps the largest center of military secrets of the most powerful nation on earth.
|
By innocent I mean the government's "we had nothing to do with this" story. My point is that in this particular incident, I don't think their hands are entirely clean.
Additionally, the FBI swept the area for evidence right after the plane hit. The FBI is not known to be first-responders on any crime scene. Now granted, they probably did have some real estate in the Pentagon anyways, but the main FBI building, the J. Edgar Hoover building, is almost 3 miles away. I'm sure protocols are different for a defense building, but that just seems fishy.
Also, they haven't released any other footage of the plane hitting, and have far more confiscated video than publicly-released video. Can someone please explain this to me if the proof is apparently in the five-frame security footage the Pentagon released themselves? I also don't totally understand why the hijackers had to make a huge loop to hit the damn thing. Couldn't they have just leveled down on top of the Pentagon and created more carnage that way? Seems like a waste of effort to me.