09-13-2011, 10:36 AM
|
#739
|
God of Hating Twitter
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by robocop
Well since there's no clear video of a plane hitting the pentagon it's kind of hard to agree. The problem I have with the whole argument from both sides is the completely unscientific and illogical methods. Did the government have a hand in 9/11? Frankly I have no idea, I've heard arguments from both sides, both vehement. The problem is there is no conclusive evidence and to draw 100% certain conclusions about a situation with so much controversy is ridiculous, the biggest problem I have with it all is one side takes one wrong idea the other has and then runs with it assuming the entire side of the argument is wrong. (e.g. it's improbable bombs were planted in the buildings therefore everything you say is wrong)
It's frustrating to see people who are so certain when the evidence either way is so inconclusive, the proper approach should be a scientific one. If people wanted to know so bad they should form an independent unbiased organization with the sole priority of investigating what really happened in a professional manner. Otherwise it's all just a waste of time. False flag attacks have happened in the past and to assume the American government is immune to such events is insane, but to assume a conspiracy without conclusive evidence is equally insane
|
__________________
Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!
|
|
|