Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
How in the hell can you call it collateral damage. Please show me where the American's or the Western Troops were going out of their way to target civillians as a part of a policy of terror?
These mutts took hostages, and then intentionally flew jets full of hostages into buildings packed with civillians.
There were no members of the U.S. military hiding in the world trade center. You could argue that the Pentagon was a military target, thats fine, but that doesn't obsolve the evil of the murdering hostages.
And no, I am not ok with collateral damage, however I do realize that it does happen.
|
From their perspective it's collateral damage, yes.
And you know what, you're attitude is the kind of attitude that can carry a war on through generations. I think a better approach would be to look at what they are capable of doing to us, figure out why they wanted to do it (surely it relates to the west's policies in the middle east and military interventions all over the world), and discuss with them ways of solving these problems and finding peace. They want us out of their countries? Fine, that's totally fair. We're packing up tomorrow.
If everybody had your attitude, this will just become tit for tat forever.