Quote:
Originally Posted by dobbles
so i was watching the video EA put out for HUT mode. in it they show all the legends. their ratings are awful! gretzky is an 88??!??!?!? i know he will naturally have some lower ratings in the physical areas, but dude is the best player ever and rated like crap. from the screenshot you can see roenick appears to also be rated 88. so now jeremy freaking roenick. (whom i have trouble even calling a 'legend') is rated just as strong as the great one?!?!?!
i know EA loves to cower behind the fact that overalls are just numbers and its all about individual ratings and based on player types. i honestly don't care about those cop out excuses. the best players in the league should be rated the best by far. their continued massacring of ratings is embarrassing.
 |
I really agree, and think it's the same problem for the broken BeAGM AI.
If there is 10 points separating the flames Best player from the worst player on the roster, no wonder the AI can't evaluate trades.
Is David Moss seriously 9 points worse than Iginla? What is that, like 11 percent? You're telling me David moss is 89 percent as good as Jarome Iginla? Feck off, and I love David Moss.
I would have no problem with Bouwmeester at 84 if it meant Brent Carson was a 68, if that 68 was playable. Because a Borderline NHL'er is SIGNIFICANTLY worse in relative terms than a top pairing Dman, and that goes for any team.
Jonathan Ericksson is MUCH WORSE, in a relative measurement, than Brian Rafalski, yet is only like 5 points less.
Give me some freakin' range here.