Quote:
Originally Posted by stignasty
|
It's really a shame that legislators pay zero attention to what is a very significant factor in this discussion. This also isn't a "fringe opinion - it's something that's been known for several years now. Going to "hands free" makes almost zero difference in the accident rate.
I'll grant you that it'll reduce texting. But ultimately the law falls short. If talking on a phone is the same as talking with hand's free, then there's really no point to having it.
Of course the cell phone manufactures have a vested interest in selling hands free devices as a "safety option" so there is a significant financial aspect that can't be ignored. They'll make money on this, so of course come out in full support.
It's just too bad that the safety issue is ignored. It's about distraction, not the use of the driver's hands.
I'd frankly like to see a total ban. The roads kill so many people, and it just seems nobody really cares. The US started 2 wars because 2000 people were killed in 9/11, but 50,000 die every year on the highway, and we can't even get people off their phones?
Pathetic.
At least in Alberta's case it's one step ahead. Now we just need people to understand hand's free isn't any better than holding the phone to your ear.
(BTW - I have to put my own cell in the trunk of my car when I drive. The temptation to use it is too great. So I'm as guilty as everyone else)
Edit - a couple other studies in case you're interested.
Nova Scotia
BMJ