Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I mentioned it earlier, but the only alternative 9/11 theory that I see as plausible is that some higher ups in the U.S. government knew that Al Qaeda were planning a terrorist attack and they allowed it to happen so that they could politicize the event to their advantage. Such a conspiracy would not require a lot of people and would be pretty easy to pull off. You'd just need a few people to put bureaucratric roadblocks.
|
There was poor communication and incompetence created by nearly everyone that touched the intelligence pre-9/11, and that goes all the way back through the Clinton government. There was almost certainly a conspiracy at work on 9/11, and that was a conspiracy of stupidity. They didn't have the specifics of the dates and times, but they certainly had an idea of the use of planes, and they had a rough idea of the air school participants. They didn't have the specific targets either, if I remember some of the stuff that I've read, or the departure points, but they knew that Al-Queda was obsessed with the use of passenger planes.
If the CIA was so sure of things, why did one of the senior members of the CIA who dealt with Al-Queda and knew that Al-Queda was planning something resign from the CIA and go to work at the World Trade Center only to be killed on the day of the attack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
I'm just saying plausible, not that it is what I believe with certainty. Conspiracy theorists are trying to make things way too complicated. For example, what would be the point of even having controlled detonations at the towers? Like, flying planes into them wouldn't be horrific enough? Why would the government have to risk pulling off an elaborate demolition that would certainly increase the number of people involved? It just doesn't make sense.
|
Thats the rub isn't it? But it was the only way that the CIA could destroy the alien clone bodies that were being stored in freezers in WTC 7