Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
The hassle of playing musical chairs? Yeah it's really tough to stand up, walk 40ft and sit down again. Man, what a hassle.
And you still missed the point. If that 'hassle' is a legitimate solution in the case of a service animal why does it cease to be a legitimate solution in the case of a non-service animal? If the argument is that moving isn't sufficient to correct the problem, then fine, the necesitty argument makes sense. But if it's accepted that the relocation solves the problem there's simply no reason why the status of the animal should matter.
|
Because it is a non-service animal.
"Sir, would you mind moving so this gentleman with a disability can have his dog with him? There is someone sitting near him who has a severe allergy and needs to be moved to another part of the plane?"
"Sir, would you mind moving so fluffy can come on the plane? There is not really any good reason why they need to be on the plane and not in the cargo hold, but there is someone with an allergy who can't sit by the dog."
Are the two about scenarios the same thing?