Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
He is also not talking about raising the capital gains tax rate at all, even though that is the exact reason he is paying less taxes as a percentage than his secretary.
|
He pretty much did. From his NYT article:
Quote:
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.
I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.
|
Perhaps I'm reading it wrong, but I interpret that passage as him telling US lawmakers that they need not worry about slowing down economic investment and job creation if they raise the capital gains tax.
[Edit]
And further in the same article, he outright calls for an increase in the capital gains tax:
Quote:
|
But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
|