[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by puckluck

Lol I missed the point? Maybe make your point more clearer then. What's the point of telling us how much your bike costs and how much Lockes car costs and mentioning ego in the same sentence if it has nothing to do with your argument? For the record I really don't have a huge problem with cyclists as I don't work downtown and rarely see them on my commute to work which is mostly on the highways, I just find your arrogance pretty hilarious. And honestly it sounds like you have the biggest ego out of everyone which isn't necessarily a bad thing but I think you have to start looking into the mirror and realize not everyone thinks like you on the road. I couldn't care less about the relative cost thing between cyclists and vehicles and whoever does has ego issues like you say but I don't think 99.9999 percent of people care about being passed in a big expensive suv or truck or any car for that matter. The problem lies with the cyclists who are convenient pedestrians and vehicles of the road. City of Calgary does need more bike lanes, but until they do I think cyclists should have to obey the rules of the road.

Okay, so you're saying that cyclists should follow the rules of the road because it annoys you when they break them for the sake of conveneince.

How then do you justify your own stance that people who do 100km in the left lane of deerfoot grind your gears as they prevent you from going faster (read: "Breaking the rules for the sake of convenience")?

Do you not understand how hypocritcal that is?