All the legal mumbo jumbo aside, the letters are this: the first full of beautiful prose at which the heart are accusations of government action and inaction based on conjecture; and a response in a highly sarcastic tone addressing the fact that the accusations are based on little to no actual facts.
Perhaps a better approach would have been for AI to put together a real case of concerns based on facts that they may have had to work to obtain. Anyone can read the newspaper and get this info. Shouldn't they be doing a little more legwork before firing off their open letters?
Oh, and for those that think that Kenney calling AI out in the first paragraph of his response was uncalled for, AI spends three paragraphs high-fiving itself for all their pure awesomeness in the human right arena. Reality check, maybe?
__________________
zk
|