Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
^ please elaborate on both your two previous posts because you've just said: "NO!" and not explained anything.
|
I'm not really sure how to explain something when the example used was so absurd. It's like saying you can't make cars? Really? Hyperbole at its finest. The base level of understanding is either not there, or the 'I hate Apple' goggles are far too strong for any reasonable attempt to understand the issues.
The patent field is highly complex, each and every little tweak can turn something from a unique and protectable device to a generic device open to the entire world. None of us can say for certain that Apple can reach that standard here, but the mere fact that the case has gotten to this point demonstrates that it is very possible if not likely. You don't get an injunction like this without being able to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits.