Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare
What exactly is the problem? People who otherwise might not have been vaccinated received legitimate vaccines, not placebos, right? Might that little bit of intelligence-gathering (which didn't even yield the hoped-for DNA sample) have saved some lives?
|
Because it's a baited trap under the false pretense of promoting health, and the farthest thing from benevolence. Vaccinations should never be used as a tool of deception, especially in health care where people are trusting their lives to a physician. And were true vaccines even being properly administered? To efficiently get DNA for screening you'd probably have to get some blood, something that is tough to do when a vaccine is given appropriately ie. Not injected into a vessel, through a tiny bore needle, and without aspiration.
Medical ethics is quintessentially about
doing no harm; A physician employing medicine as a weapon of war is reminiscent of Nazi physicians.
And before someone says it: the notion of "saving future lives by killing the murderer" is BS - we don't let known gang members die on the trauma table, and we sure as hell wouldn't consciously do something that would expedite their demise. We treat them the same as we would treat our own siblings/parents/etc. Judgements about one's past or future actions has no role in dictating healthcare.