Yeah that must be it. Thanks for the reminder why arguing against the conspiracy theory is fruitless.
Anyway, a more detailed view of the paper and why they think it's flawed:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php...ture-feedback/
And a few other views
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/0...r-roy-spencer/
http://www.climatecentral.org/blogs/...bunked-or-not/
That's interesting, I didn't know Spencer was the source of the "satellites show it isn't warming" myth.