Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
There's likely precedent that makes this relatively clear, but can't an argument be made that you are acting in the course of employment the whole time your traveling if your job requires it?
Apologies in advance for a boring post in a thread about rough sex
|
Well I'm not a lawyer, but I would assume its rooted in precedent somewhere. I just know that the WCB position is clearly that it has to be part of your job though. I would assume they would deny coverage for this as a result and defend based on this not being part of the persons job.