Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck
You had no problem assuming that it was a muslim and he did it for religious reasons right?
So now you only question the motives after it was found out he was Christian? And for the record I don't thnk religion played any part in this attack, but it makes you look like a hypocrite. You know a muslim can also attack without having religious reasons?
Anyways, I'm done with you in this thread as I've read your past posts in other threads and there is no getting through to you.
|
I fail to see the problem with assuming a terrorist attack is caused by muslim terrorists and not assuming a christian carrying out a bombing is religiously motivated. You're too idealistic if you purely separate thought like that while ignoring recent history.