Listened to a prosecutor a few years ago talking about how juries have come to expect C.S.I Vegas like evidance and it is becominging increasingly difficult for the crown to 'prove' cases to juries who expect concrete forensic evidense even though very few cases don't have some element of circumstantial evidance.
I suspect this is a case that would have been found guilty 10 years ago when juries were expected to use some common sense.
|